Skip to content

Human performance · Organisation maturity audit

Know whether your people system actually works

An independent, evidence-based audit of how well your HR function performs, across 6 domains and 42 capabilities. It shows what to fix first, and proves progress year on year.

Retention · Friction · Discretionary effort · Commercial outcomes
Why it matters

Talent is a precious resource in a scarce market

The people who carry your critical knowledge, client relationships and know-how are hard to find and harder to replace. Every competitor is drawing on the same limited pool, so keeping the people you have is the most direct way to protect performance. The audit connects the capability of your people system to four outcomes leaders care about.

Keep the people you want

Capable people stay where work is fair, clear and well supported, and leave where it is not.

INDICATORS THE AUDIT EXAMINES
  • Regretted attrition
  • Early leavers
  • Time to productivity

Less friction

When roles, decisions and processes are clear, the same outcome takes less effort to deliver.

INDICATORS THE AUDIT EXAMINES
  • Time to fill and time to decide
  • Rework and policy exceptions
  • Workload and effort signals

More discretionary effort

People give more judgement, energy and creativity when they believe the system is fair and they can do meaningful work well.

INDICATORS THE AUDIT EXAMINES
  • Engagement that is acted on
  • Manager effectiveness
  • Voluntary contribution

Better commercial outcomes

Stable, engaged teams deliver consistently, keep customers confident and sustain growth.

INDICATORS THE AUDIT EXAMINES
  • Continuity in critical roles
  • Productivity and delivery
  • Customer feedback
0.5–2×annual salary: the range Gallup puts on the cost of replacing one employee.Source: Gallup, “This Fixable Problem Costs U.S. Businesses $1 Trillion” (2019). A US-based estimate.
Friction

The more you care, the more friction costs you

Every organisation has some friction: competing demands, processes that take longer than they should, decisions that are hard to get. The more friction there is, the longer and harder the route to the same outcome, and the more emotional effort it takes. The people who care most feel it most.

Friction → Extra effort → Disconnect → Burnout → People leave

Finding the friction is the first step to reducing it. The audit locates it in specific capabilities, with evidence.

Effort to deliver the same outcome
Low friction
Some friction
High friction
An illustration of the idea, not measured data.
Where friction builds up
Organisation and job design. Unclear roles and hand-offs make simple work slow.
Governance design. Decisions wait because nobody is sure who decides.
Assessment, selection and onboarding. Slow, inconsistent hiring and a weak first 90 days.
Job evaluation and grading. Pay that cannot be explained invites doubt and escalation.
Performance management. Feedback that never arrives, or arrives too late.
The case for assurance

Most organisations know what they spend on people. Far fewer can prove the system works.

In many organisations, leadership confidence in HR rests on trust and historic practice, not on objective evidence that the people system delivers the outcomes the business needs.

Our people are engaged.
An engagement survey proves employees were asked questions, not that engagement is acted on.
Our recruitment process works.
A process map proves a process was designed, not that it consistently selects the right people.
Managers are managing performance.
A policy proves a policy exists, not that performance is managed in practice.
Our HR systems are robust.
An HR system proves technology was implemented, not that it improves a workforce outcome.
DesignedWhat is supposed to happen?
DemonstratedWhat actually happens?
Experienced and measuredDoes it work?

Trust is important. Assurance requires evidence. An audit closes the gap between intended standards, observed execution and organisational outcome.

The model

Six domains. 42 capabilities. Seven evidence lenses.

Select a domain to see its capabilities and why each one matters. Every capability is rated across the same seven lenses: intent, design, governance, execution, evidence, outcomes and improvement.

10k42 CAPABILITIES · 6 DOMAINS

No single domain delivers an outcome alone. The audit looks at all six together.

What you get

A finding you can act on, traced to evidence

Every rating in the report traces back to specific evidence. Here is a short extract from a sample report. All data is fictional.

The executive view

Six domains at a glance

HR role andfoundationsWorkforceplanningRewardTalentacquisitionOrgeffectivenessMaximisepotential
HR role and foundationsRequires improvement
Strategic workforce planningNeeds development
Compensation and benefitsNeeds development
Acquire new talentNeeds development
Enable organisational effectivenessRequires improvement
Maximise potentialNeeds development

Radar scale: 1 needs development, 2 requires improvement, 3 good, 4 outstanding.

One capability, seven lenses

Skills and competency frameworks

Needs development

Finding. No competency framework or skills matrix exists for any role. The strategic plan names digital and AI capability as a priority, but no skills plan was found, and HR had not been consulted.

IntentNo stated intent to build a skills or competency framework in any strategic or HR document.Absent
DesignNo competency framework, skills matrix or capability model exists for any role.Absent
GovernanceNo owner identified. 3 of 6 senior leaders assumed it sat with department heads.Absent
ExecutionSome ad hoc training, but not against any defined skills standard.Partial
EvidenceNo skills audit or self-assessment data in any system reviewed.Absent
OutcomesCannot show whether readiness for the priority has changed.Absent
ImprovementNo mechanism for identifying or acting on skills gaps.Absent
Quick wins, within one term
  • Run a short staff self-assessment against a list of the skills the priority needs. It can be built in two to three weeks with existing survey tools.
  • Name an accountable owner for the capability, even on an interim basis, so the priority has a person responsible.

Illustrative extract from a sample report. A full report covers all 42 capabilities, with a prioritised 12 to 36 month roadmap.

How it works

Diagnose first. Transform second.

A structured six-week diagnostic that builds an evidence-based baseline without creating unnecessary operational burden. Typically four to six weeks, depending on the organisation.

Week 1
Discovery and evidence gathering
  • Kick-off and stakeholder interviews
  • Documentation request and collection
  • Survey design
  • HR process deep-dive (1–2 days)
Weeks 2–5
Evidence validation and diagnosis
  • Employee sentiment questionnaire
  • Former-employee and exit questionnaire
  • Analysis and triangulation of findings
  • Interim findings for key stakeholders
Week 6+
Findings, recommendations and action
  • Finalisation of report and recommendations
  • Objective-setting workshop(s)
  • Recommendations for immediate changes
  • Agreement of ongoing support needs
What the organisation receives
  • Maturity baseline and domain scoring
  • Heatmap of risk and capability gaps
  • 12–36 month roadmap with milestones
  • Governance pack and assurance dashboard
  • Reassessment and QA review
What we need from you
  • Access to key personnel in Week 1 and around Week 4
  • Requested documentation in a timely manner
  • Prompt responses to follow-up questions
Questions
Do we need to be strong in all 42 areas?

No. The point is to know where you stand, decide which gaps matter most for your strategy, and close them in a sensible order.

Can we see the scoring framework?

We are happy to walk you through the domains, capabilities and lenses. The detailed scoring method and weightings stay with us; that is where the value of the audit lies.

Can we repeat it to track progress?

Yes. The same model is applied the same way each time, so year-on-year results are directly comparable.

Do we have to use 10k for the follow-on work?

No. The findings are yours. You are welcome to continue with us, but the audit stands on its own.

The guide

Get the Organisation Maturity Audit guide

A 28-page guide to the model: why the people system drives retention, friction, discretionary effort and results, the 42 capabilities we assess, and how an audit works.

  • The case for assurance, not trust
  • All 42 capabilities: why each matters, what good looks like, and the evidence we review
  • How results are presented, prioritised and reassessed
Send me the guide
We will email you a personal link to the guide and may follow up about the audit. We use your details only for this; see our privacy notice.

Configure the whole organisation, or start with one area.

Start with a conversation about what you’re seeing. No pitch, and no obligation.

Start a conversation